On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Alexander Belopolsky <alexander.belopol...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:31 PM, Mark Dickinson <dicki...@gmail.com> wrote: > .. >> Neither is necessary, because Python doesn't actually use == as the >> equivalence relation for containment testing: the actual equivalence >> relation is: x equivalent to y iff id(x) == id(y) or x == y. This >> restores the missing reflexivity (besides being a useful >> optimization). > > No, it does not: > >>>> float('nan') in [float('nan')] > False
Sure, but just think of it as having two different nans there. (You could imagine thinking of the id of the nan as part of the payload.) There's no ideal solution here; IMO, the compromise that currently exists is an acceptable one. Mark _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com