On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Mark Dickinson <[email protected]> wrote: .. > There's no ideal solution here; IMO, the compromise that currently > exists is an acceptable one.
I don't see a compromise. So far I failed to find a use case that benefits from NaN violating reflexivity. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
