2010/4/16 Raymond Hettinger <raymond.hettin...@gmail.com>: > >>> Guido van Rossum, 16.04.2010 16:33: >>>> >>>> I am fine with >>>> declaring dict({}, **{1:3}) illegal, since after all it is abuse of >>>> the ** mechanism. > > ISTM that making it illegal costs cycles with giving any real benefit. > It is reasonably common to accept **kwds and then pass it down > to another function. Do we want to validate the keys of every > kwds dict on every call? Why do we even care? > > If I'm understanding the proposal correctly, it means that > every existing application using **kwds will pay a price, either > by breaking (because it uses non-string keys) or by running > slower (so that every call can be checked to make sure it > didn't use string keys).
We already pay that price for any Python function, so I'm not sure what difference adding to C, too, makes. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com