On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 4:33 PM, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: .. >> Why >= 1? > > Because that's what the datetime module accepts.
What the datetime module accepts is irrelevant here. Note that functions affected by accept2dyear are: time.mktime(), time.asctime(), time.strftime() and indirectly time.ctime(). Neither of them produces result that is directly usable by the datetime module. Furthermore, this thread started with me arguing that year > 9999 should raise ValueError and if we wanted to restrict time module functions to datetime-supported year range, that would be the right thing to do. If I understand your "garbage in garbage out" principle correctly, time-processig functions should not introduce arbitrary limits unless there is a specific reason for them. In datetime module, calendar calculations would be too complicated if we had to support date range that does not fit in 32-bit integer. There is no such consideration in the time module, so we should support whatever the underlying system can. This said, I would be perfectly happy with just changing y >= 1900 to y >= 1000. Doing so will spare us from making a choice between '0012', '12' and ' 12' in time.asctime(). Time-series that extend back to 19th century are not unheard of and in many places modern calendar was already in use back then. Anything prior to year 1000 would certainly require a custom calendar module anyways. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
