Le lundi 21 mars 2011 à 14:51 -0400, Jesse Noller a écrit : > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 2:48 PM, Antoine Pitrou <solip...@pitrou.net> wrote: > > On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 19:33:55 +0100 > > DasIch <dasdas...@googlemail.com> wrote: > >> > >> 3. Several benchmarks (at least the Django and Twisted ones) have > >> dependencies which are not (yet) ported to 3.x and porting those > >> dependencies during GSoC as part of this project is an unrealistic > >> goal. Should those benchmarks, at least for now, be ignored? > > > > Why not reuse the benchmarks in http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/ ? > > Many of them are 3.x-compatible. > > I don't understand why people are working on multiple benchmark suites > > without cooperating these days. > > > > Regards > > > > Antoine. > > Antoine: The goal is to *get* PyPy, Jython, IronPython, etc all using > a common set of benchmarks. The idea stems from http://speed.pypy.org/ > - those benchmarks grew from the unladen swallow benchmarks, which I > think are the ones in http://hg.python.org/benchmarks/.
Ok, I can stand corrected. Last time I looked, speed.pypy.org had an entirely disjunct set of benchmarks. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
