> ISTM, there has been substantial mission creep from > the workflow described in the PEP. If the current workflow > had been described there, I don't think it would have been > readily accepted.
I don't think PEP 385 actually *was* accepted at all (PEP 374 was, selecting Mercurial). I had meant to insist on a formal review of the PEP, but gave up on that due to the time pressure to complete the conversion before PyCon. Some of the open issues of the PEP are actually still open. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
