On Mon, 21 Mar 2011 22:47:19 +0100 "Martin v. Löwis" <mar...@v.loewis.de> wrote: > > ISTM, there has been substantial mission creep from > > the workflow described in the PEP. If the current workflow > > had been described there, I don't think it would have been > > readily accepted. > > I don't think PEP 385 actually *was* accepted at all (PEP 374 > was, selecting Mercurial). I had meant to insist on a formal > review of the PEP, but gave up on that due to the time pressure > to complete the conversion before PyCon.
I don't think a formal review of the PEP would have brought any of the points which have been made after (or even during) the conversion. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
