On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 03:42:27PM -0700, Glenn Linderman wrote:
> and didn't figure I had time to learn both. I haven't read the new devguide
> yet, but from the activity on the list, it would seem that either no one else

I think, it is a good idea to read that. You might find that many
discussions are stemming from assumptions rather than following the
instructions.

> the devguide, and attempt to submit code to the http.server to try to fix the
> many bugs and limitations it has, many of which I've worked around or fixed in
> a private copy of server.py.  No one else seemed to be interested enough in
> those bugs when I reported them to fix them prior to the release 3.2, so it

I remember your issues, many of them are I would say 'tricky' ones
which would need some time to review/fix. Let's see it to get it in
3.3 release.

> seems to me that code is basically unmaintained.  The present state of the 
> code
> is sort of like a dead battery... it might function a little but has such
> severe limits that it is not particularly useful... and it is an itch I might
> be able to scratch.

If you wish, please maintain a mecurial repository and point the full
code in the bug-reports, it may be easy to pull a patch and patch the
current line of code. 

-- 
Senthil
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to