2011/4/25 haael <ha...@interia.pl>: > >> Because there's no reason to include them, since they are already in >> the root (builtins) namespace. >> >> You'll notice that in Python 3, the "types" module only contains types >> which are not obviously accessed through easier means: > > > OK, makes sense, but in this case it would be handy to have some list of all > possible built-in types. I was just creating one and I nearly missed sets. > If an entry in 'types' module is too much, there should be some > comprehensive list in the documentation at least.
http://docs.python.org/dev/library/stdtypes -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
