Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> a écrit : > 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <brian.cur...@gmail.com>: > > Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for > > multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move > > things in the future > > Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention > it as an idea. > > In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more > to little advantage.
Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather than plans to rename things around. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
