On Aug 10, 2011, at 1:36 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > Le Wed, 10 Aug 2011 14:54:33 -0500, > Benjamin Peterson <[email protected]> a écrit : >> 2011/8/10 Brian Curtin <[email protected]>: >>> Now that we have concurrent.futures, is there any plan for >>> multiprocessing to follow suit? PEP 3148 mentions a hope to add or move >>> things in the future >> >> Is there some sort of concrete proposal? The PEP just seems to mention >> it as an idea. >> >> In general, -1. I think we don't need to be moving things around more >> to little advantage. > > Agreed. Also, flat is better than nested. Whoever wants to populate the > concurrent package should work on new features to be added to it, rather > than plans to rename things around.
I concur. Raymond _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
