Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan <at> gmail.com> writes: > Compilation can be a problem on Linux systems as well, so a platform > neutral format is a better idea. Just have a mechanism that allows > pysetup to create a bdist_msi from a bdist_simple. Similar, bdist_rpm > and bdist_deb plugins could be taught to interpret bdist_simple.
I agree that a platform-neutral format is a good idea, but there might be other complications with binary formats, which I'm not sure we've considered. For example, if we're just bundling self-contained C extensions which just link to libc/msvcrt, that's one thing. But what if those extensions link to particular versions of other libraries? Are those referenced binaries supposed to be bundled in the archive, too? I don't know that the dependency language supported by packaging extends to these kinds of dependencies on external, non-Python components. If we leave it to the packager to include all relevant binary dependencies, I'm not sure how satisfactory that'll be - possibly, not very. Regards, Vinay Sajip _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
