On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 09:46, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote: > Let's make one thing clear. The Python core developers need to be able > to reproduce your results from scratch, and that means access to the > templates, code generators, inputs, and everything else you used. (Of > course for stuff you didn't write that's already open source, all we > need is a pointer to the open source project and the exact > version/configuration you used, plus any local mods you made.) > > I understand that you're hesitant to just dump your current mess, and > you want to clean it up before you show it to us. That's fine. But > until you're ready to show it, we're not going to integrate any of > your work into CPython, even though some of us (maybe Benjamin) may be > interested in kicking its tires. And remember, it doesn't need to be > perfect (in fact perfectionism is probably a bad idea here). But it > does need to be open source. Every single bit of it. (And no GPL, > please.) > I understand all of these issues. Currently, it's not really a mess, but much more complicated as it needs to be for only supporting the inca optimization. I don't know what the time frame for a possible integration is (my guess is that it'd be safe anyways to disable it, like the threaded code support was handled.) As for the license: I really don't care about that at all, the only thing nice to have would be to have a pointer to my home page and/or the corresponding research, but that's about all on my wish list.
--stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com