On 29Apr2012 21:31, Benjamin Peterson <benja...@python.org> wrote: | 2012/4/29 Jim J. Jewett <jimjjew...@gmail.com>: | > In http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2012-April/119134.html | > Benjamin Peterson wrote: | > | >> I see PEP 418 gives time.clock_info() two boolean fields named | >> "is_monotonic" and "is_adjusted". I think the "is_" is unnecessary and | >> a bit ugly, and they could just be renamed "monotonic" and "adjusted". | > | > I agree with monotonic, but I think it should be "adjustable". | | I don't really care, but I think "adjusted" is fine. As in "this clock | is adjusted (occasionally)".
-1 on "adjustable". That suggests the user can adjust it, not that the OS may adjust it. +1 on "adjusted" over "is_adjusted". -- Cameron Simpson <c...@zip.com.au> DoD#743 http://www.cskk.ezoshosting.com/cs/ Winter is gods' way of telling us to polish. - Peter Harper <bo...@freenet.carleton.ca> <harp...@algonquinc.on.ca> _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
