On 06/06/2012 09:16 AM, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
Nevertheless, the world is full of doorknobs, and people will have to
deal with their code.
I'm having a hard time seeing it. Can you propose a credible situation
where
* some programmer would have a reason (even a bad reason) to modify
the cached Signature for a function,
* as a result it would no longer correctly match the corresponding
function,
* you would be forced to interact with this code and the modified
Signature, and
* it would cause you problems?
If you can, what adjustment would you make to the PEP to ameliorate this
situation?
And, as Brett cites, the consenting adults rule applies here.
All of a sudden I'm thinking of "Olsen's Standard Book Of British Birds",
//arry/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
