On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote: > +1 for the general idea and for using Py_LIMITED_API. I still like my > idea of a simple macro based on Include/patchlevel.h, for example: > > #define Py_API_VERSION(major, minor, micro) \ > (((major) << 24) | ((minor) << 16) | ((micro) << 8)) > > #if Py_LIMITED_API+0 >= Py_API_VERSION(3, 3, 0) > #endif
This strikes me as in opposition to the Python-level policy of duck typing. Would it be more appropriate to, instead of asking if it's Python 3.3.0, ask if it's a Python that supports PY_FEATURE_FOOBAR? Or would that result in an unnecessary proliferation of flag macros? ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
