On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Christian Heimes <li...@cheimes.de> wrote: > Am 24.06.2012 01:11, schrieb Larry Hastings: >> On 06/23/2012 03:08 PM, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: >>> On 23.06.2012 23:41, Antoine Pitrou wrote: >>>> Perhaps something more user-friendly than the hexversion? >>> Please propose something. I think the hexversion *is* user-friendly, >> >> +1 to the idea, and specifically to using hexversion here. > > +1 for the general idea and for using Py_LIMITED_API. I still like my > idea of a simple macro based on Include/patchlevel.h, for example: > > #define Py_API_VERSION(major, minor, micro) \ > (((major) << 24) | ((minor) << 16) | ((micro) << 8)) > > #if Py_LIMITED_API+0 >= Py_API_VERSION(3, 3, 0) > #endif
+1 to all 3 of those from me (the general idea, using hexversion, and providing a convenience macro to skip having to spell out hexversion manually). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com