On Sun, Dec 09, 2012 at 01:51:09PM +1100, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 9, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote:
> > Why would a software package called "Spam" install a top-level module called
> > "Jam" rather than "Spam"? Isn't the whole point of Python packages to solve
> > this namespace problem?
> 
> That would require/demand that the software package MUST define a
> module with its own name, and MUST NOT define any other top-level
> modules, and also that package names MUST be unique. (RFC 2119
> keywords.) That would work, as long as those restrictions are
> acceptable.
> 
/me notes that setuptools itself is an example of a package that violates
this rule )setuptools and pkg_resources).

No objections to "That would work, as long as those restrictions are
acceptable."... that seems to sum up where we're at.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgpC3zr5ZrDtv.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to