2013/3/4 Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]>
> On 01.03.13 17:24, Stefan Bucur wrote:
>
>> Before digging deeper into the issue, I wanted to ask here if there are
>> any implicit assumptions about string identity and interning throughout
>> the interpreter implementation. For instance, are two single-char
>> strings having the same content supposed to be identical objects?
>>
>
> I think this is not a bug if the code relies on the fact that an empty
> string is a singleton. This obviously is an immutable object and there is
> no public method to create different empty string.
Really?
>>> x = u'\xe9'.encode('ascii', 'ignore')
>>> x == '', x is ''
(True, False)
--
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
