Am 20.06.2013 17:35, schrieb Benjamin Peterson: > 2013/6/20 Charles-François Natali <cf.nat...@gmail.com>: >> 2013/6/20 Thomas Wouters <tho...@python.org>: >>> If the .py file is going to be wrong or incomplete, why would we want to >>> keep it -- or use it as fallback -- at all? If we're dead set on having a >>> .py file instead of requiring it to be part of the interpreter (whichever >>> that is, however it was built), it should be generated as part of the build >>> process. Personally, I don't see the value in it; other implementations will >>> need to do *something* special to use it anyway. >> >> That's exactly my rationale for pushing for removal. > > +1 to nixing it.
I'm +0 for removal. The stat module contains merely constants, wrappers for macros and one simple functions. Somebody just say the word. Christian _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
