Hi, On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: >>>> process. Personally, I don't see the value in it; other implementations >>>> will need to do *something* special to use it anyway. > > That's not correct. Other implementations can do exactly what CPython 3.3 > does, namely just use stat.py as given. Not all implementations necessarily > care about multiple platforms where stat constants are likely to change.
Thanks Steven. That's PyPy's position: for now we really care only about <insert some list of common platform there> where stat.py has been obviously sufficient, as shown by CPython's long experience with stat.py. A bientôt, Armin. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
