3.3 adds some -X options around faulthandler if I recall correctly. Alex
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>wrote: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> > wrote: > > On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:40:13 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:20 PM, senthil.kumaran > >> > <python-check...@python.org> wrote: > >> >> .TP > >> >> +.BI "\-X " option > >> >> +Set implementation specific option. > >> > > >> > > >> > Should probably be "Set the implementation-specific option." > >> > >> Is there anyone respecting this notation? (I know pypy does not, it > >> uses --jit and stuff) > > > > CPython does. We introduced it for ourselves, it is up to other > > implementations whether or not to use it, or use something else. > > > > --David > > you mean "CPython does not have any implementation-specific options"? > I would claim -O behavior should be implementation-specific since it's > nonsense in the optimizations sense, but other than that, it does not > seem that there is any -X options? > _______________________________________________ > Python-checkins mailing list > python-check...@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-checkins > -- "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it." -- Evelyn Beatrice Hall (summarizing Voltaire) "The people's good is the highest law." -- Cicero GPG Key fingerprint: 125F 5C67 DFE9 4084
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
