2013/6/24 Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 6:14 PM, R. David Murray <rdmur...@bitdance.com> > wrote: >> On Sun, 23 Jun 2013 17:40:13 +0200, Maciej Fijalkowski <fij...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >>> > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:20 PM, senthil.kumaran >>> > <python-check...@python.org> wrote: >>> >> .TP >>> >> +.BI "\-X " option >>> >> +Set implementation specific option. >>> > >>> > >>> > Should probably be "Set the implementation-specific option." >>> >>> Is there anyone respecting this notation? (I know pypy does not, it >>> uses --jit and stuff) >> >> CPython does. We introduced it for ourselves, it is up to other >> implementations whether or not to use it, or use something else. >> >> --David > > you mean "CPython does not have any implementation-specific options"? > I would claim -O behavior should be implementation-specific since it's > nonsense in the optimizations sense, but other than that, it does not > seem that there is any -X options?
I wouldn't object to making that -Xno-docstrings or such, but the ship sailed long ago on -O. -- Regards, Benjamin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
