On Thu, 15 Aug 2013 11:28:52 +1000 Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > These are all very good arguments, for both sides, and it is a balance > between code churn and bit rot, but on balance I'm going to come down firmly > in favour of Nick's earlier recommendation: PendingDeprecation (and/or a move > to a "Legacy" section in the docs). In a couple more releases there may be > concrete plans for an eventual Python 4, at which time we can discuss whether > to delay deprecation until Python 4 or drop it sooner.
We don't have any substantial change in store for an eventual "Python 4", so it's quite a remote hypothesis right now. Regards Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
