On 20 Mar 2014 10:34, "Steven D'Aprano" <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:01:39PM +0100, Antoine Pitrou wrote: > > On Thu, 20 Mar 2014 07:54:39 +1000 > > Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Graeme Dumpleton has also subsequently written a library to handle easier > > > creation of correct proxy types: https://pypi.python.org/pypi/wrapt > > > > (is "Graeme" another spelling for "Graham"?) > > Yes. > > > > > It isn't as simple as changing one lookup function though - abstract.c > > > reads the type slots directly, and those are already hairy performance > > > critical code paths (especially the binary operator type dispatch). > > > > Oh indeed, you're right. I think my proposal is taking water. > > Nevertheless, I would like to see a standard way to proxy dunder > methods.
I had vague plans to bug Graham (yay, spelling!) about proposing wrapt for inclusion in 3.5 (possibly split between functools and types rather than as a completely new module, though). functools.wraps was always intended as a near term workaround that, like most sufficiently effective workarounds, ended lasting years before its limitations irritated anyone enough for them to go back and do it right :) Cheers, Nick. > > > -- > Steven > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/ncoghlan%40gmail.com
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com