Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> writes: > If people were going to be prone to mistake > > with (a, b, c): ... > > as including a tuple
… because the parens are a strong signal “this is an expression to be evaluated, resulting in a single value to use in the statement”. > they would have already mistaken: > > with a, b, c: ... > > the same way. But they haven't. Right. The presence or absence of parens make a big semantic difference. -- \ “The process by which banks create money is so simple that the | `\ mind is repelled.” —John Kenneth Galbraith, _Money: Whence It | _o__) Came, Where It Went_, 1975 | Ben Finney _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
