On 08/17/2014 09:40 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
Le 17/08/2014 20:08, Nick Coghlan a écrit :
On 18 Aug 2014 09:57, "Barry Warsaw" <ba...@python.org
<mailto:ba...@python.org>> wrote:
>
> On Aug 18, 2014, at 09:12 AM, Nick Coghlan wrote:
>
> >I'm talking more generally - do you *really* want to be explaining
that
> >"bytes" behaves like a tuple of integers, while "bytes.bytes"
behaves like
> >a tuple of bytes?
>
> I would explain it differently though, using concrete examples.
>
> data = bytes(...)
> for i in data: # iterate over data as integers
> for i in data.bytes: # iterate over data as bytes
>
> But whatever. I just wish there was something better than iterbytes.
There's actually another aspect to your idea, independent of the naming:
exposing a view rather than just an iterator.
So that view would actually be the bytes object done right? Funny :-)
Will it have lazy slicing?
bytes.sorry()? ;-)
- C
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
