> On Sep 8, 2014, at 6:43 PM, Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> On 9 Sep 2014 08:30, "Donald Stufft" <don...@stufft.io 
> <mailto:don...@stufft.io>> wrote:
> >
> > If someone wants to do this, can’t they write their own 6 line function?
> 
> Unfortunately not, as the domain knowledge required to know what those six 
> lines should look like is significant.
> 
> Keeping the old unsafe behaviour around with a more obviously dangerous name 
> is much simpler than explaining to people "Here, copy this chunk of code you 
> don't understand".
> 
> If we were starting with a blank slate there's no way we'd offer such a 
> thing, but as Jim pointed out, we do want to make it relatively easy for 
> Standard Operating Environment maintainers to hack around it if necessary.
> 
> Cheers,
> Nick.
> 
> >
> > import ssl
> > import urllib.request
> > _real_urlopen = urllib.request.urlopen
> > def _unverified(*args, **kwargs):
> >     if not kwargs.keys() & {“context”, “cafile”, “capath”, “cadefault”}:
> >         ctx = ssl.create_default_context()
> >         ctx.verify_mode = CERT_NONE
> >         ctx.verify_hostname = False
> >         kwargs[“context”] = ctx
> >     return _real_urlopen(*args, **kwargs)
> >
> > ---
> > Donald Stufft
> > PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA
> >


Why isn’t documentation with appropriate red warnings a suitable place if we 
really must have it? That sounds like a much better solution that some weird 
function people monkeypatch. It gives them more control over things (maybe they 
have a valid certificate chain, but an invalid host name!), it’ll work across 
all Python implementations, and most importantly, it gives us a place where 
there is some long form location to be like “yea you really probably don’t want 
to be doing this” in big red letters.

Overall I’m -1 on either offering the function or documenting it at all, but if 
we must do something then I think documentation is more than enough.

---
Donald Stufft
PGP: 7C6B 7C5D 5E2B 6356 A926 F04F 6E3C BCE9 3372 DCFA

_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to