On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 8:57:15 AM Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 21 November 2014 23:29, Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: > > On Fri Nov 21 2014 at 7:37:13 AM Nick Coghlan <ncogh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If that "must be self-hosted" constraint is removed, then the obvious > >> candidate for Mercurial hosting that supports online editing + pull > >> requests is the PSF's BitBucket account. > > > > There's also CodePlex and (ironically) SourceForge for open-source hg > > hosting. > > Did SF end up actually integrating Hg hosting properly? They hadn't > the last time I looked - it was still a third party addon to Allura. > > I'll spell this out in the PEP, but the reason I suggest BitBucket in > particular is: > > - it's written in Python > - the PSF already has an organisational account set up there > - I have admin access, so I can bootstrap other folks as > administrators (Christian Heimes & Brian Curtin are also admins) > - I know the online editing works reliably, since I maintain the PyPI > metadata PEP drafts there > - having used both it and GitHub extensively, I'm confident the > workflows are similar enough that anyone familiar with GitHub will be > able to easily pick up the BitBucket UI > You're putting more thought into the response than I did in the suggestion. =) I just know they claim to host hg repos. > > As far as ignoring PR noise goes, we can still request that folks > squash any commits (keep in mind that the proposal is only to move > pure documentation repos, so long complex PR chains seem unlikely). > Well, requesting that and actually getting it are two different things, especially when I don't know of any way to rewrite a commit message after the fact if we go back to someone and say "your commit message is bad, please fix it".
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
