> Antoine Pitrou wrote: > On Fri, 21 Nov 2014 13:29:11 +0000 > Brett Cannon <br...@python.org> wrote: >>> If that "must be self-hosted" constraint is removed, then the >>> obvious candidate for Mercurial hosting that supports online editing >>> + pull requests is the PSF's BitBucket account. >>> >> >> There's also CodePlex and (ironically) SourceForge for open-source hg >> hosting. > > I hope nobody's gonna suggest SourceForge seriously for anything. It's the > SharePoint (or Lotus Notes) of software forges.
SourceForge can be Lotus Notes; CodePlex is SharePoint :-) BitBucket is a much better option than either of those. Since I discovered hggit (and got it working), I'm less opposed to github than I have ever been, but I still prefer BitBucket. It just feels more pragmatic and less like a cattle market. I'm not hugely for/against moving the repo, though I do like the general idea of reducing the amount of work committers have to do. Cheers, Steve > Regards > > Antoine. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
