On Nov 24, 2014 3:12 AM, "Nick Coghlan" <ncogh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 24 Nov 2014 10:41, "Donald Stufft" <don...@stufft.io> wrote: > > > > > > > On Nov 23, 2014, at 6:57 PM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 08:55:50AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: > > > > > >> But I strongly believe that if we want to do the right thing for the > > >> long term, we should switch to GitHub. > > > > > > Encouraging a software, or social, monopoly is never the right thing for > > > the long term. > > > > > > http://nedbatchelder.com/blog/201405/github_monoculture.html > > > > I don’t think this is really all that big of a deal. If we want to move > > off of Github doing so is easy. > > It's only easy to leave if you never adopt any GitHub-only services like Travis CI. It's the same lockin play as the one Google uses: make it easy for people to move their data, so they're less likely to notice you're locking them in with proprietary APIs and ecosystems instead.
- [ ] list of features ranked by stakeholder value - [ ] pingbacks - [ ] in-band build status - [ ] tagging commits with #num - [ ] web standards for integration (HTTP webhooks are the standards here) ... 'Zapier' For this acquisition; is there a feature comparison matrix with alternatives across the top and namespaced features along the side? > > You unlikely to see significant amounts of VC funding pouring into a company unless the investors see a possible chance to extract monopoly rents at some point in the future. > > Cheers, > Nick. > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/wes.turner%40gmail.com >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
