On 28 May 2015 at 12:51, Ned Batchelder <n...@nedbatchelder.com> wrote: > This issue has been fixed, but a day or two late for 3.5b1.
Aye, we only found out about the missing test case via feedback *on* the beta. We had never needed to worry about it before, but it turns out all our extension modules in the standard library are top level modules and we didn't previously have an explicit test for the submodule case :( > It prevents > loading the coverage.py extension. It'd be great to get a new beta release > soon. :) Until your email, I hadn't fully thought through the consequences, but the bug is actually going to block a *lot* of potential testing of the beta release - anything that requires a C extension module that isn't a top level module isn't going to work with 3.5b1. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
