Nick Coghlan schrieb am 28.05.2015 um 05:02: > On 28 May 2015 at 12:51, Ned Batchelder wrote: >> This issue has been fixed, but a day or two late for 3.5b1. > > Aye, we only found out about the missing test case via feedback *on* > the beta. We had never needed to worry about it before, but it turns > out all our extension modules in the standard library are top level > modules and we didn't previously have an explicit test for the > submodule case :( > >> It prevents >> loading the coverage.py extension. It'd be great to get a new beta release >> soon. :) > > Until your email, I hadn't fully thought through the consequences, but > the bug is actually going to block a *lot* of potential testing of the > beta release - anything that requires a C extension module that isn't > a top level module isn't going to work with 3.5b1.
+1 for a quick beta 2 from me, too (obviously). I've already seen a bug report because a Cython compiled package doesn't work in Py3.5. Having to tell them to wait a while for beta 2 is annoying and discouraging for early testers. Stefan _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
