On 27 April 2016 at 23:08, Nick Coghlan <[email protected]> wrote: > On 27 April 2016 at 17:14, Serhiy Storchaka <[email protected]> wrote: >> I think that we can resolve this issue by following steps: >> >> 1. Add a new function PyModule_AddObject2(), that steals a reference even on >> failure. > > I'd suggest a variant on this that more closely matches the > PyList_SetItem and PyTuple_SetItem cases: PyModule_SetAttrString
And for the record: that suggestion was prompted by Hrvoje's email suggesting using a more descriptive name, I just went and looked up the name of the corresponding PyObject_* API. Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | [email protected] | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
