On Sun, Jun 12, 2016 at 09:01:09PM +0100, Cory Benfield wrote:
> My problem with /dev/urandom is that it’s a trap, lying in wait for
> someone who doesn’t know enough about the problem they’re solving to
> step into it.

And my answer to that question is absent backwards compatibility
concerns, use getrandom(2) on Linux, or getentropy(2) on *BSD, and be
happy.  Don't use /dev/urandom; use getrandom(2) instead.  That way
you also solve a number of other problems such as the file descriptor
DOS attack issue, etc.

The problem with Python is that you *do* have backwards compatibility
concerns.  At which point you are faced with the same issues that we
are in the kernel; except I gather than that the commitment to
backwards compatibility isn't quite as absolute (although it is
strong).  Which is why I've been trying very hard not to tell
python-dev what to do, but rather to give you folks the best
information I can, and then encouraging you to do whatever seems most
"Pythony" --- which might or might not be the same as the decisions
we've made in the kernel.

Cheers,

                                                - Ted

P.S.  BTW, I probably won't change the behaviour of /dev/urandom to
make it be blocking.  Before I found out about Pyhton Bug #26839, I
actually had patches that did make /dev/urandom blocking, and they
were planned to for the next kernel merge window.  But ultimately, the
reason why I won't is because there is a set of real users (Debian
Stretch users on Amazon AWS and Google GCE) for which if I changed how
/dev/urandom worked, then I would be screwing them over, even if
Python 3.5.2 falls back to /dev/urandom.  It's not a problem for bare
metal hardware and cloud systems with virtio-rng; I have patches that
will take care of those scenarios.

Unfortunately, both AWS and GCE don't support virtio-rng currently,
and as much as some poeple are worried about the hypothetical problems
of stupidly written/deployed Python scripts that try to generate
long-term secrets during early boot, weighed against the very real
prospect of user lossage on two of the most popular Cloud environments
out there --- it's simply no contest.
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe: 
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to