Anyway, given the outcome of Dino's tests I have no objections to the PEP. (Though using Christian's hack would be cool.)
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Christian Heimes <christ...@python.org> wrote: > On 2016-08-29 23:38, Brett Cannon wrote: >> That means we still want to find a solution to attach arbitrary data to >> code objects without sacrificing performance. One proposal is what's in >> PEP 523 for the extra field. Another option is to make the memory >> allocator for code objects pluggable and introduce a new flag that >> signals that the object was created using a non-default allocator. >> Obviously we prefer the former solution due to its simplicity. :) > > May I remind you that you can have the field with no extra memory cost? > :) The struct has sub-par alignments. > > Christian > _______________________________________________ > Python-Dev mailing list > Python-Dev@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev > Unsubscribe: > https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/guido%40python.org -- --Guido van Rossum (python.org/~guido) _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
