On Mon, Aug 29, 2016, 17:06 Terry Reedy <tjre...@udel.edu> wrote:
> On 8/29/2016 5:38 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
>
> > who objected to the new field did either for memory ("it adds another
> > pointer to the struct that won't be typically used"), or for conceptual
> > reasons ("the code object is immutable and you're proposing a mutable
> > field"). The latter is addressed by not exposing the field in Python and
>
> Am I correct is thinking that you will also not add the new field as an
> argument to PyCode_New?
>
Correct.
> > clearly stating that code should never expect the field to be filled.
>
> I interpret this as "The only code that should access the field should
> be code that put something there."
>
Yep, seems like a reasonable rule to follow.
-brett
> --
> Terry Jan Reedy
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-Dev mailing list
> Python-Dev@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
> Unsubscribe:
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/brett%40python.org
>
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
