On Thu, 25 Jan 2018 at 10:51 Berker Peksağ <berker.pek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 9:38 PM, Mariatta Wijaya > <mariatta.wij...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> That would be best solution (I think it would solve > >> https://github.com/python/miss-islington/issues/16 too) but it's more > >> complicated than the extension idea :) I have some time work on it if > >> you'd like to implement the mergebot idea. > > > > > > +1 for the mergebot! :) > > > > New bot or miss-islington's new job? > > > > Still +1 either way, as long as other core devs are fine with it too :) > > I'm not familiar with miss-islington's codebase. Can we reuse some > parts of miss-islington in the new bot? If we can, let's implement it > in miss-islington (perhaps as a new mode?) > I would assume it would just go into miss-islington, but before we get ahead of ourselves and design this we need to get consensus that people like the overall idea of using a bot to do a main commits as well.
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
