----- Original Message ----- > On 23/05/12 08:16, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > How does this compare to Tarek Ziade's existing pypi2rpm project? > > > > From a quick look, the main difference appears to be that pyp2rpm > > creates a spec file only, while pypi2rpm creates the RPM directly. > Pyp2rpm supports a packager to create an initial spec. > Using pypi2rpm there's IMHO no way to get produced rpms into fedora. > (because of missing srpm) > > If you don't care about that, I guess, pypi2rpm will be good enough. >
Yes, it is exactly as Matthias says. pyp2rpm is a tool for packager, it creates an rpm specfile, which is prefilled with the automatically extractable data. pypi2rpm is a tool for user who wants to create binary rpms, but it can't produce specfile nor srpm in any form. -- Regards, Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda. _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
