> But this section explicitly only covers the rare case where a py2 and > py3 version of something provide _different_ functionality.
> The example spec is for the normal case. That's why it's up above the > "Avoiding collisions between the python 2 and python 3 stacks" section. > That section covers a specific case which applies to only a few packages. Well, here's what the guidelines say about the normal case: "If the executables provide the same functionality independent of whether they are run on top of Python 2 or Python 3, then only the Python 3 version of the executable should be packaged." Since the spec file does package both p2 and p3 versions of the executable, I infer that we are indeed dealing with the case where it is beneficial to package both p2 and p3 version of the executable, in which case my first post applies and the example is wrong. So in summary, either the example is wrong by packaging both p2 and p3 versions of the executable, or it is wrong by packaging the p3 version of the executable as the default one. _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
