> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:35:03PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > Ah, OK. It didn't at some point and I didn't check. > It seems that the Guidelines:Python page could still use some > editing. I think most of the info is there, but it's not very clear. > > In particular, the multiple-executables case is again very prominent > (as this thread shows), and it's really applicable to a miniscule > percentage of packages (literally: sphinx, pytest, nosetest, a bunch > of python development and installation tools. There's a spattering > of other random packages, which might be mistakes. E.g. python-nibabel > also provides versioned executables, but that I don't think there's a > good reason for that). The way that Guidelines are written only serves > to confuse packagers.
So, I think we're in agreement that the example is not ideal and can be very confusing. As Robert pointed out, there's already a ticket for the change at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558, however it appears to have been inactive for months. Would you know what can be done to get the example fixed? Tomas _______________________________________________ python-devel mailing list python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
