On 10-04-2024 11:57, Lumír Balhar wrote:
This sounds like an interesting idea for one more reason. We are
currently working on the update of pytest to version 8 and that version
no longer runs nose setup/teardown functions/methods which, as far as we
know now, is a change that breaks a lot of packages we previously
migrated from nose to pytest.
For some of those it might be easier to switch them to pynose than to
try to fix their tests for pytest.
Sure. That could probably be done independently of the "greater" goal of
making pynose a drop-in replacement. Of course, it still requires the
package to be added to Fedora. It's kinda ready for review. But I'd like
to polish it some more. Stay tuned.
But we already saw some successors of nose and they weren't really
successfull.
Well, from my preliminary examination of the packages that failed with
pynose, I found six could trivially be reverted to using nosetests.
Another six failed for unrelated reasons. And four need some more
investigation[1].
For the trivial packages it was usually replacing `%{__python3} setup.py
test` with `nosetests -v`. Going by the project's description, "pynose
is an updated version of nose". Not a successor that needs adaptation,
but basically a continuation. Time will tell.
[1] Ik know that adds up to 16. One package sneaked its way onto the
list, though it works fine with pynose.
-- Sandro
--
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
