On 29.08.2016 11:37, Chris Angelico wrote:
That's why I keep asking you for code examples. Real-world code, taken
from important projects, that would be significantly improved by this
proposal.
There was no reasonable real-world code examples taken from important
projects, that would be significantly improved by underscores in numbers.
Still, we got them, so your argument here is void.
It has to be Python 3 compatible (unless you reckon that
this is the killer feature that will make people take the jump from
2.7), and it has to be enough of an improvement that its authors will
be willing to drop support for <3.6 (which might be a trivial concern,
eg if the author expects to be the only person running the code).
All of those "has to be"s are optional (cf. underscores in numbers) and
that's not different for this proposal.
Sven
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
