Nikolaus,
I have belatedly realized that this kind of hyperbole is counter productive.
So let me back away from that statement and instead try to understand your
reasons for not liking the proposal.
Do you think there is no value to be able to naturally read and write numbers
with SI scale factors from Python? Or is your issue with something about my
proposal?
-Ken
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 06:59:15PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> On Aug 28 2016, Ken Kundert
> <python-ideas-jl/pdlm0qtzz1n+oakn...@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> > So, in summary, you are suggesting that we tell the scientific and
> > engineering
> > communities that we refuse to provide native support for their preferred
> > way of
> > writing numbers because:
>
> I think you're making some incorrect assumptions here. Who, exactly, do
> you mean with "we" and "them"?
>
> I consider myself part of the scientific community and think your
> proposal is a bad idea, and Google finds some Python modules from you,
> but no prior CPython contributions...
>
> Best,
> -Nikolaus
>
> --
> GPG encrypted emails preferred. Key id: 0xD113FCAC3C4E599F
> Fingerprint: ED31 791B 2C5C 1613 AF38 8B8A D113 FCAC 3C4E 599F
>
> »Time flies like an arrow, fruit flies like a Banana.«
> _______________________________________________
> Python-ideas mailing list
> Python-ideas@python.org
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
> Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
