On Sun, Oct 16, 2016 at 12:06 AM, Mikhail V <mikhail...@gmail.com> wrote: > But I can bravely claim that it is better than *any* > hex notation, it just follows from what I have here > on paper on my table, namely that it is physically > impossible to make up highly effective glyph system > of more than 8 symbols.
You should go and hang out with jmf. Both of you have made bold assertions that our current system is physically/mathematically impossible, despite the fact that *it is working*. Neither of you can cite any actual scientific research to back your claims. Bye bye. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
