On 11/16/2016 08:48 AM, Mikhail V wrote:
On 16 November 2016 at 10:27, Paul Moore wrote:
On 16 November 2016 at 08:51, Mikhail V wrote:
What semantics it will fundamentally break or so hard to implement?
I'm afraid I don't have time at the moment to fully review your email,
but my first impression is that you are proposing that the name "self"
be treated specially. It's going to be very difficult to convince
people that this is a good idea.
Oh Paul, come on, pleeeeease.
I am making an **example**. Write a "poo" instead or a poo pile character,
whatever. You think I am an idiot and don't know that there is "self" in OOP.
When I was writing that I just thought, should I make a special note
that I am making it only for example, but then thought, oh that would
be too pedantic.
Next time, include the "just an example" disclaimer. We don't know what you do
and don't know.
You say you have no time and write a whole page about it,
so don't blame me that I take too much time from you.
Hopefully you were joking, but it's really hard to tell.
--
~Ethan~
_______________________________________________
Python-ideas mailing list
Python-ideas@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas
Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
