On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 2:25 AM, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > If I'm reading this right, you want this behaviour: > > class Spam: > pass > > def Spam.func(self): pass > > assert 'Spam.func' not in Spam.__dict__ > assert 'func' in Spam.__dict__ > > assert Spam.func.__name__ == 'Spam.func' > assert Spam.func.__qualname__ == 'Spam.Spam.func' > > If that's the case, I can only ask... what advantage do you see from > this? Because I can see plenty of opportunity for confusion, and no > advantage. > >
I might be wrong about the __name__; that was a response that came from the massively extensive research of "hmm, I think this would be what I'd do". It seems the simplest way to cope with the many possibilities; having __name__ be "func" would work in the dot form, but not others. But that's bikeshedding. ChrisA _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
