On 14 April 2017 at 04:20, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > Long ago, when the operator module was first introduced, there was a > much stronger correspondence between the operator.__dunder__ functions > and dunder methods. But I think that correspondence is now so weak that > we should simply treat it as a historical artifact.
+1 from me, with this rationale. The specifics sounds pretty good to me, too - happy to review a PR if you put one together :) Cheers, Nick. P.S. To be completely honest, I'd forgotten the dunder names in operator were there :) -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia _______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
