Hi, I have opened a pull request at https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/1171
I am not sure of the wording used, and I'd love some feedback. Thanks! On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 8:10 AM Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 12:09:39AM +1000, Nick Coghlan wrote: > > On 14 April 2017 at 04:20, Steven D'Aprano <st...@pearwood.info> wrote: > > > Long ago, when the operator module was first introduced, there was a > > > much stronger correspondence between the operator.__dunder__ functions > > > and dunder methods. But I think that correspondence is now so weak that > > > we should simply treat it as a historical artifact. > > > > +1 from me, with this rationale. The specifics sounds pretty good to > > me, too - happy to review a PR if you put one together :) > > http://bugs.python.org/issue30085 > > For some reason, Github won't allow me to log in at the moment. It keeps > insisting I need to enable cookies, even though I have. Perhaps it > doesn't like my browser? I'll have to try on another computer with a > different browser. > > Terry, you had some nice suggestions for wording. If you want to submit > a PR, feel free to take over the issue. I probably won't get a chance to > do any more on this for a week. > > > > -- > Steve > _______________________________________________ > Python-ideas mailing list > Python-ideas@python.org > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas > Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/ >
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
