On 31 October 2017 at 02:29, Guido van Rossum <gu...@python.org> wrote:
> What's your proposed process to arrive at the list of recommended packages? > I'm thinking it makes the most sense to treat inclusion in the recommended packages list as a possible outcome of proposals for standard library inclusion, rather than being something we'd provide a way to propose specifically. We'd only use it in cases where a proposal would otherwise meet the criteria for stdlib inclusion, but the logistics of actually doing so don't work for some reason. Running the initial 5 proposals through that filter: * six: a cross-version compatibility layer clearly needs to be outside the standard library * setuptools: we want to update this in line with the PyPA interop specs, not the Python language version * cffi: updates may be needed for PyPA interop specs, Python implementation updates or C language definition updates * requests: updates are more likely to be driven by changes in network protocols and client platform APIs than Python language changes * regex: we don't want two regex engines in the stdlib, transparently replacing _sre would be difficult, and _sre is still good enough for most purposes Of the 5, I'd suggest that regex is the only one that could potentially still make its way into the standard library some day - it would just require someone with both the time and inclination to create a CPython variant that used _regex instead of _sre as the default regex engine, and then gathered evidence to show that it was "compatible enough" with _sre to serve as the default engine for CPython. For the first four, there are compelling arguments that their drivers for new feature additions are such that their release cycles shouldn't ever be tied to the rate at which we update the Python language definition. > And is it really just going to be a list of names, or is there going to be > some documentation (about the vetting, not about the contents of the > packages) for each name? > I'm thinking a new subsection in https://docs.python.org/devguide/stdlibchanges.html for "Recommended Third Party Packages" would make sense, covering what I wrote above. It also occurred to me that since the recommendations are independent of the Python version, they don't really belong in the version specific documentation. While the Developer's Guide isn't really the right place for the list either (except as an easier way to answer "Why isn't <X> in the standard library?" questions), it could be a good interim option until I get around to actually writing a first draft of https://github.com/python/redistributor-guide/ (which I was talking to Barry about at the dev sprint, but didn't end up actually creating any content for since I went down a signal handling rabbit hole instead). Cheers, Nick. -- Nick Coghlan | ncogh...@gmail.com | Brisbane, Australia
_______________________________________________ Python-ideas mailing list Python-ideas@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-ideas Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/